Site icon Econ Eye

Fairfield County and a K-Shaped Economy

A recent tax bill has increased income inequality in Fairfield County. Higher-income households, concentrated in towns like Greenwich, have seen rising after-tax incomes due to tax cuts. Lower-income households, concentrated in towns like Bridgeport, have experienced stagnant or declining incomes as eligibility for government benefits has been reduced.—ft.com

Answer the following questions to check your understanding of the story.

Which best defines a K-shaped economy?

Wrong! - A K-shaped economy does not describe income inequality at a single point in time or income inequality which decreases over time. Income sources do not define a K-shaped economy.

Well Done! - A K-shaped economy refers to diverging income trends over time, with different income groups moving in opposite directions.

Why does Fairfield County illustrate a K-shaped economy?

Wrong! - Income differences alone do not imply a K-shaped economy without divergence over time. Tax and benefit status alone does not explain income trends. Inequality is increasing, not shrinking.

That's Right! - Fairfield shows opposing income trends: rising incomes at the top and falling or stagnant incomes at the bottom.

How has the tax bill affected the Lorenz curve for income after taxes and benefits in Fairfield County?

Wrong! - Inequality has risen, not fallen. Perfect equality has not been achieved. A change in inequality changes the Lorenz curve’s distance from the line of equality.

Correct! - Higher-income households receive tax cuts while lower-income households lose benefits, increasing inequality.

Exit mobile version